
- Image by jesuscm via Flickr
Twitter is certainly raising the profile of social media, although marketers/brands don’t know what it is, it does get them asking questions – which is a win for social media generally.
However, I and lots of other pessimists doubt Twitter’s phenomenal growth and how it’s changed the world. For me it’s profile is partly due to it’s value to the publishing community – basically it helps journalists find stories quick, which makes their lives easier, so they write about it lots.
However, a Hubspot report, which surveyed 4.5 million Twitter accounts gives us a good indication of the uptake of the new craze.
Some of the key stats from the study are:
- Currently 32.1M users, up from 1.6M 12 months ago
- The average user has tweeted 119.34 times in total
- The average user has a following-to-follower ratio of .7738
- 24.14% of users have a bio in their profile
- 31.32% of users have a location in their profile
- 20.21% of users have a homepage URL in their profile
- 45.12% of users have tweeted at least once
- 47.29% of users have at least one follower
- 44.50% of users are following at least one account
- You can read more here: http://blog.hubspot.com/Portals/249/sotwitter09.pdf
On the surface there’s been a growth in user-base from 1.6M (12 mths ago) to 32.1M (now) – a 2000% increase in 12 months – not bad. But as we all know not all the users are active, so lets consider the inactive accounts – inactive account could be defined many ways, I’m using ‘have not followed anyone’ as a broad measure. Hubspot tells us that 55.5% of people aren’t following anyone, which brings the active user-base down to 14.2M.
Assuming all of the original 1.6M users were ‘active’ the growth year on year is 787%. Now which ever way you want to skin that, or define ‘inactive’ that’s still impressive growth. Maybe it’s not as big as Facebook or MySpace, but how often do MySpace & Facebook get press based on their ‘active users’?
I still believe that Twitter is an over-hyped application, however, it is changing the game – and making marketers & businesses sit up and atleast ask questions.
Other discussions on the report
- GigaOm: Ironic But True – Many on Twitter are Just Silent
- SFGafe: Most Twitter Users are less than Twitter-obsessed
- VentureBeat: Twitter Study Finds More Lurkers than Active Users
- Mashable: Are Twitter Users Inactive?


June 19th, 2009 on 1:24 pm
Spot on Simon.
So many have run with the bounce rate of Twitter. The truth is twitter has had phenomenal exposure – even overexposure. If anything it’s teaching the lay business world about the power of social media, as it enters the masses.
I think we should also never underestimate the power of “what’s next?”, especially online.
July 1st, 2009 on 8:43 pm
I’ve heard a lot lately discussions abou who’s better: twitter or facebook. I think is a superficial debate, because they are different. Both social networks , but different.