EVENT: Social Gaming & Gamificiation: The Challenges & Opportunities

Our second to last event for 2011 is an exciting one, and you only have a couple of days notice (apologies)

Over the last two years the world has gone casual gaming mad, with 5 million hours of Angry Birds being played every day and 200M people playing Facebook games for over 40mins each per month. Facebook is set to make a huge $1B from gaming in an industry set to make an incredible $70B in 2015.

This broad adoption of gaming has driven the rise of branded gaming & gamification as a marketing strategy. At this event we dive into the opportunities, examples & challenges for brands entering the gaming world.

We have an esteemed panel that will cover:

  • Media opportunities in social gaming on Farmville (Zynga) & Pop Cap
  • The process & thinking around game creation & gamification
  • How to integrate gaming into marketing strategies

This event is a limited ticket release due to the venue size.

RSVP’s are essential click here http://socialgaming.eventbrite.com/

The Panel

Daniel Ferguson, rep Zynga & Pop Cap Australia (Spiral Media)Dan brings global insight to the social gaming revolution, educating the Australian market on the opportunities and challenges. With over 10 years gaming experience and an involvement in MySpace Australia from the very beginning, Dan has evolved from advertising sales into gaming & social technology. He now works with the King Hitters of gaming – Zynga, EA & more.
Harry Ravenswood , Multiplatform TV, ABCHarry is responsible for developing online content portals, mobile apps and games projects. He has over 10 years experience in the commercial games industry, leading teams as a Lead Game Designer or Producer for studios in Australia and overseas. Most recently, Harry was Lead Game Designer for Krome Studios Melbourne, and prior to that he was Lead Designer in the UK for both Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (SCEE London) and Kuju London (now Headstrong Games).
Gavin Heron, Creative Director, Visual JazzGavin offers an agency perspective on integrating games with advertising & marketing, having done so for clients like Defence, Yogo, Visy and the ABC. He recently spent time at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) in the US where gamification was a hot topic.
Event MC, Yvonne Adele – Ideas CultureTwitter: @ideasculture LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/yvonneadele

 

 

Event location

The Order of Melbourne

2/401 Swanston Street, Melbourne

http://www.theorder.com.au/

 

Follow Social Media Club Melbourne

Website: http://socialmediaclubmelbourne.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/smcmelb

Twitter: http://twitter.com/smcmelb

Hashtag for event #SMCMELB The Social Media Club Melbourne is a volunteer not for profit and events are organised by @nikski, @inBloome, @gutta, @simontsmall and @timbeveridge.


Facebook lists: Bye bye Google Circles

So, last week I had a rant that Google+ will not cause the instant demise of FB and one of my points was that Facebook are smart and they’ll respond…Well they have. Already.

Tonight I discovered Facebook ‘lists’ which directly combats the Google+-Circle-mania that’s been going on. But it’s a whole bunch better because FB knows so much about YOU that it can recommend lists (i.e. your work place, or your suburb) and who’s on them. (Seems to have been rolling out over the last 6 days)

This is FB’s second attempt at grouping contacts, their first was back in 2007 and didn’t really get traction.

From what I can see there are a few standard ‘friend lists’

  • Close friends
  • Family
  • Work
  • High-school/University/College
  • Who live near you

Here are some examples that came up for me…

Facebook Lists

Facebook Lists - Collingwood

Facebook Lists - Highschool

Facebook Lists - Work

Facebook Lists - Best friends

It’s also integrated into your friend’s profile pages, suggesting which list they fit into if you haven’t assigned them already.

Facebook lists - Friend Suggestion

And it’s very helpful when creating lists

Facebook lists - suggestions

Hmmm… Google+ destroy’s Facebook? Anyone?

I also read an article tonight from ReadWriteWeb with “5 Things Google Plus Can Do To Outbox Facebook which provides some interesting observations. However, the FIVE things will really only bring G+ up to speed with FB, not outbox them.


Google Plus+ to destroy Facebook?

Google+ hit 20M users in three weeks smashing all targets and overloading their server capacity.

It took Facebook 3 years to achieve what Google+ has in only 12 days. Well kinda, to be fair, Facebook took the concept of social networking to the masses, and Google launched G+ off the back of 193.3M Gmail subscribers, integrating it into their email inbox.But it’s early days, we can’t really go around claiming who’s going to win the battle yet can we? Well lots of people are making all kinds of claims, and quite frankly it’s pissing me off.

And here’s 6 reasons why.

1. Industry freaktards go wild!

Wow, 20M users in 2 weeks, amazing!?!?! Plus a recent study found that 50% of Facebook users want to move to Google+. Nice headline but the survey was run by tech publisher PC Mag, I’m pretty sure their audience is what you’d call ‘nerds’, I think that’s the scientific name for it. And that’s my first and main point, all this hubbub about Facebook’s demise is based on the premise that some freak-nerd-social-media-fanatic-did-i-say-nerd-o-philes love to play with new toys and predict the next big thing.Did you see what the crazy ‘head of social’ at Channel 7 went out proclaiming last week? “To be honest, I’ve never really understood Facebook.” Adam Boland. C’mon that’d just plain stupid. (If you want more retard headline grabbing bold annoying claims read these “11 predictions from Social Media Pros“.UPDATE (14/9/11): In Australia Facebook is getting 718 times the number of visits as Google Plus

I got the data guys at Visual Jazz to look at high level trends in Australia using Hitwise and here’s the graph that shows a pretty grim picture for Google Plus.

Take a chill pill people, let’s see what the real humanoids think of it.

2. Each site play’s a role in your life

As one of the few readers of my fairly lame and rarely updated blog, you probably have a couple of social media accounts, maybe Twitter, or LinkedIn, some photo sharing or maybe a blog like Tumblr. They all play very different roles in each of our lives, I love Twitter for staying on top of what’s going on in work world, but Facebook is purely for friends. And LinkedIn, it’s basically my CV online. I know you’re thinking, “but Simon, they’ve got circles, it’s going to change the freakin world man” but maybe it’s just me being simple but I like to work and play separate.You currently use several social networks. The question is “What role can G+ play in your social nerdy world”

3. Hard yakka

Moving house is hard work and if you ask your friends to help out it’s almost more painful organising & feeding/bribing  them. Imagine uprooting your entire social history, which is primarily people, messages & photos and starting a-fresh, c’mon seriously? To punters, Facebook isn’t a platform, software, technology thingo, it’s 328 friends and a record of the last 2 years of your public lives together.The carrot needs to be a lot greater than a circle, hangout and stuff.

4. Competition is good

Remember when Bing came out, while not many people predict the demise of Google, many said it would put a dent in Google’s growth. Well it hasn’t from all our data 91-97% of traffic from search is coming from Google, bing makes up a part of the other bits, and Hitwise report Google getting 92.8% of all search traffic in Australia. But that’s not really related, sorry I’m a terrible blogger/writer, the point is Google has stepped it up every time Bing release a feature that Google believe to be getting traction. Which is great because Google is better now (the amount of updates since Bing’s launch is phenomenal), and the same rule applies to Facebook.This assumes that Facebook is a smart company, which we’ll have to assume as they have one of the biggest most visited sites in the world, and they’ve probably thought about Google making this kind of play. And if another person goes on about Circles and how much it’ll destroy Facebook I will punch them, in the face.If Facebook can’t implement ONE feature (like circles) that’s going to be appealing to a mass audience, they’ve got bigger problems.

5. Who’s ur daddy?

But really, who’s G+ really competing with? I reckon it’s a greater threat to LinkedIn and Twitter than it is to Facebook. By default your profiles/feeds are public (and followable) like Twitter/LinkedIn and they’ve chucked in a big piece of content functionality called “Sparks” which reminds me of other sites like Tumblr, Digg, StumbleUpon, and more.To me it’s clear, G+ is a greater threat to Twitter and LinkedIn than it is to Facebook.

6. Facebook = smart!

They made the most popular site on the internet. That wasn’t an accident. </end>

Facebook is a super smart & strategic company, revolutionising the way technology fits into our lives, to assume they’re not able to compete with Google’s 3rd attempt at a social networking site is truly absurd. (I heard Buzz/Wave were going to be amazing when they launched)

I hope these points bring some kind of sanity to the current public debate about how G+ is going to solve global warming and dramatic demise of Facebook.

And if I’m being a completely hypocritical ass tell/punch me.

** I’m not saying G+ isn’t great and plays a role, but anybody predicting anything about what’s going to happen is lying.



Airport security is child’s play

What does it take to create a major airport security breach, mass evacuation and waste potentially 2 hrs of 15,000 people’s time?

Answer: A kid plus a switch and a security gate.

It’s being investigated but it seems like a little kid switched off a security scanner letting 16 people get through without being scanned.

End result: Traffic jam, frustration and sad faces :(

It just seems a little weird/simple for a switch and a kid to be able to cause such havoc.

At least it gave me an excuse plus the time to write a blog post, even if it’s got nothing to do with digital or marketing or anything, although I have been traveling weekly for the last few months, so it’s kinda an insight into my life (of exciting airports :[ )


How marketers are using social media

LinkedIn third social networking site used by Marketers

What I find interesting about this study of how marketers are using social media is that over 80% are using Facebook & Twitter, followed very closely by LinkedIn at 78%. Why I’m surprised is that from my experience LinkedIn is a very difficult channel to achieve the objectives they listed in the diagram above (right). LinkedIn is mostly a place to improve your personal career, not your employers brand.

Social Bookmarking a priority over MySpace

It’s also funny how we’re all still interested in social bookmarking site but so bored of MySpace, when the ability to use Social Bookmarking sites to achieve marketing outcomes at any scale is extremely hit and miss and you can build a MySpace page, buy some media and have an effective reach of 100,000-1,000,000 in Australia. Maybe it’s because it was once so mighty and now that it’s not number one we’ve all moved on.

The full report is available here in video and PDF formats, thanks to Social Media Examiner.

http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/social-media-marketing-industry-report-2010

How marketers are using social media

Thanks to Flowtown for turning data into pictures, again.


Lazy post: Digital Ninja

hahaha! (Thanks for the AM funnies @bridgetct)

digital ninja from moon stuff on Vimeo.


We’re losing touch thanks to touch screens.

When one of my new team members (Johann) started 4 months ago I learnt an enormous amount about Albinism and the implications on the senses. I also discovered a lot about how the human sense system is used in day to day life and how tiny things like gutters on the street, face recognition and touch screens interfere and interact with us in unusual ways.

Johann explained how important computer accessibility is for people with vision impairments and how there are some amazing technologies being researched to help overcome these problems.

Touch screens are inherently flawed.

Touch screens and other input devices are taking over our lives, we’re ditching the keyboard, tap, steering wheel and other fundamental input devices for the sleek and simple.

While this is improving the way we interact with devices and technology in many ways, there’s a fundamental issue. Simple put current Touch Screens are inefficient.

For the touchscreen mobile phone users out there you’ll know what I’m talking about, when you’re typing a message to a friend, doing a search or playing a game you have to actually look to find the keys, taking your eyes away from whatever else you could be looking at.

Remember back in the good old Nokia 5110 days you could talk to your friends, send an SMS in class walk and see where you were going because you knew where all the keys were, you could feel them.

We’ve actually lost touch.

This means we’re using Sight, a very important sense, to do the simple function of finding the keys. And as a result it’s causing lots of errors, it takes much more focus/concentration and the accessibility issues are obvious.

Lots of people are trying to work around this issue.

Aden found this interesting new approach to touch screen keyboards called 8pen, although I’m not sure if it’s the best solution. (Hat tip @gavinheron)

And there are plenty of techniques being developed like…

  • Auto-completion
  • Error correction
  • Prediction

Thankfully there’s a solution to the original problem.

The concept used is called Piezoelectricity which can send tiny highly targeted vibrations that actually emulate a raised surface. It doesn’t tickle, hurt or zap you, it just feels like the surface is actually raised.

In theory (and it’s being tested by research master minds in a few universities around the world) as you touch the emulated raised areas it actually feels exactly like a button and you can feel your way around the keyboard.

The Piezoelectic technology can raise an area quickly then just as quickly remove the raised area. This means software designers will be able to change the surface of the screen in whatever way they want to give you the best user experience.

Awesome. I reckon.

Practicality issues that come to mind.

  • Can it made at a viable price point?
  • What will it do to your battery life?
  • Can it break?
  • How accurate/sensitive will it be?
  • Does it need extra processing power?
  • How much bigger will it make my slim touch screen device?

I don’t know, it just seems like it’d make using touch devices a whole lot better.

I wonder if I’m just losing my mind or if it would actually help.

Disclaimer: I’m not a scientist, UX expert or design guru, all the opinions are based on some brief research and chats with my colleague Johann. If somethings wrong, comment to correct me just don’t judge me. Please. :P


  • What’s on this blog

  • Copyright © 1996-2010 Who is in control of your brand?. All rights reserved.
    iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress